Home | Search | FAQ
Displaying 1-8 of 8 messages in this thread. |
| Posted By | Discussion Topic: cleveland photographer sucks!!!!! | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hudsonhawk6 | posted on 02-11-2002 @ 5:57 PM |    | |||
| Hanger-On Registered: Feb. 02  | whoever did the photography for cleveland should actually know something about taking photos!!! i live in cleve. if you ever need some real photography done I'll do it for free!! | ||||
| OAAWITE | posted on 02-11-2002 @ 6:08 PM | | |||
| Hanger-On Registered: Jan. 70 | Hey thanks. I wish we had known about you before the contest. The red eyes really annoyed me and Ant, but it was too late. Mail us your portfolio and a retainer fee of $50 made out to WNEW. We'll send it back if the pictures are not sufficient and we don't want to take you on. Thanks for listening man. Commercials are almost over. Gotta go. Opie.  | ||||
King Shit *board owner* | posted on 02-11-2002 @ 6:48 PM | | |||
| O&A Board Veteran Registered: Feb. 01 | Funny, I heard the Buffalo girls were blaming the photographer too. Turns out in the end, it's not his fault they're ugly. I believe in the Faith... that can save me. I believe in the hope and I pray... That someday it may raise me... above these badlands Over The Limit | ||||
| greenlantern | posted on 02-12-2002 @ 10:50 AM | | |||
| Psychopath Registered: Oct. 00 | Did you ever think it was the girls being ugly? It's like a parent with a fucked-up kid. Always someone else's fault. "The power of 46 flashlights can be pretty strong, sometimes" | ||||
| hudsonhawk6 | posted on 02-12-2002 @ 1:03 PM | | |||
| Hanger-On Registered: Feb. 02 | no i wouldnt say there "ugly" there just not what you the listeners are looking for in this contest and ill admit only one from cleveland caught my eye and thats #42 but the photographer could have helped some of these girls out with better lighting better backgrounds,better everything! | ||||
| Nailbomb
| posted on 02-12-2002 @ 1:17 PM | | |||
| Psychopath Registered: Dec. 01 | That camera he's using is probably less than a megapixel. Either that, or he's shaving the filesize down too much before he sends them. I'm leaning towards #58. Edit: I guess this board doesn't like those HTML tags. I should've ran a preview first. This message was edited by Nailbomb on 2-12-02 @ 1:26 PM | ||||
| jessica43 | posted on 02-12-2002 @ 3:19 PM | | |||
| Hanger-On Registered: Feb. 02 | Your telling me, I entered and the chick who was taking them sent in the first two she took, which you and I can say both say SUCK, I am not that horrible looking! Jessica | ||||
| hudsonhawk6 | posted on 02-13-2002 @ 4:46 PM | | |||
| Hanger-On Registered: Feb. 02 | jessica if you ever need photography done let me know, i promise it will be ten times better than the "chick" for 92 [email protected] This message was edited by hudsonhawk6 on 2-13-02 @ 4:50 PM | ||||
Displaying 1-8 of 8 messages in this thread. |