how have i reframed the argument? your assertion was that the administration tries to spin the leaking of intelligence. WOW BIG SURPRISE.....and now wants to administer lie detector tests to vet out the moles........then you're debate buddy changed the discussion to media outlets being the tool for the administration to drive the spin machine and the discussion evolved from there, and you actively participated in it, until you were painted into a corner.
Quote:when a covert agent and the shell company she was affiliated with, were outted by agents of the Administration for political purposes, the Republican spin machine cranked out the propaganda and the rubes ate it up.......
are you all out of talking points now and are resorting to your familiar crutch of criticizing my posting?
Ken is acting like Fox News is evil because it clearly holds a conservative slant. Any fool knows Fox news is right leaning.
But in doing this he destroys his credibility by completely ignoring the fact that there are loads more left leaning news outlets who do the same thing, only they've done it far longer and out number Fox 3 to 1.
My point to you, ken, is this.
It's laughable to me that you only attack fox news for doing something you deem reprehensible and make no mention of the several outlets who are left leaning.
Why?
Because you don't want to kick the kool aide cart!
This is the area where Keyser is calling you a hypocrite and he's right.
Keyser Soze Wrote:how have i reframed the argument? your assertion was that the administration tries to spin the leaking of intelligence. WOW BIG SURPRISE.
sigh,
dumbass,
my point wasn't that the administration spins......
but that the rubes eat it up....
my intention was to shift focus onto Fox news and their compliance with the RNC... Mad (not being an idiot like yourself) understood where I was going and in the second post of the thread made the point for me....
you on the other hand keep trying to argue with me, but since you can't dispute my facts you are constantly trying to redefine my position, and then argue against your own creation.....
jesus fucking christ,
I keep trying to get past pointing out how lame you are,
Lets take Fox and CNN for a moment.
Both Fox and CNN's anchors are clearly biased both way. Fox-right, CNN-left.
The difference is:
9 times out of 10 Fox has on 2 guests who hold opposing sides of the debate. Fox has on high ranking democratic strategists etc..
CNN on the other hand rarely adds a consertvative voice to the debate. Most times it's a one on one between the anchor and a guest. And most times that guest is anti-administration.
Fox is conservative leaning but gives a voice to the left.
Not all of us are content with the basics.
Life is usually more complicated than that, with many mitigating factors.
It's more than just getting in your car and driving.
Sometimes you need to gas it up and change the oil.